30 November 2006

Litvinenko and friends

Now I'm into it. I'd like to propose the idea that Maurizio Blondet poured into my ears, because it's another possibile interpretation, and because it sounds reasonable to me.

The thing is: Litvinenko has been dying for two weeks, and having interviews of any sort against Putin. Now. If I were Putin, and I wanted someone dead, I'd kill him right away, instead of slow-poisoning him and letting him shout to the whole world how bad and evil I am. Am I right?
Newspapers say that Litvinenko spoke about the Politkovskaja affair. That's another smelly murder. It smells of many things, and was correctly done in the way and at the right time to have people scream Putin! Putin!
I'm not saying Putin is an angel, he is not and Cecenia is filled with blood he should pay for. But, but, all these murders sound like they are so much good for the big energy companies that want Putin KO, to get their hands on the gas and petrol ways that criss-cross the Russian lands.

So. Good hunt. And, good luck.

26 November 2006

Points of view - about the Litvinenko affair

Reading some italians newspapers we can know that Paolo Guzzanti, ex-president of the italian parliament commission on the Mitrokhin Dossier, is in danger of an attack from the same that are supposed to kill Litvinenko some days ago.
On his blog he says that Litvinenko had a lot on informations on the connections between Romano Prodi, actual Prime Minister of Italy, and the KGB. Litvinenko spoke about these relations also at the Commission above.
But today the newspaper Repubblica come out with a taped interview to Litvinenko from March, 3rd 2005, where he told that he replied to the above commission that he didn't knew who Prodi was.

When you tell about points of view...

It should be interesting to hear that taped interview

My dear Raqqash, this evening you can expand more on the argument. Some ideas: digging into the past of Paolo Guzzanti, an ex-communist that must have something against Afghanistan, and looking better into the two articles, where it's difficult to see Paolo saying explicitly that Litvinenko told about Prodi in front of the Commission but that is one of the main points of the article.

UALR